Mitigation Portfolio Optimization
Translate wildfire risk into financial terms to compare mitigation portfolios, prioritize spending, and support defensible investment decisions.
WHAT WE DO
FEP connects wildfire science and utility operations with financial and economic analysis. We help utilities quantify risk in dollars, compare mitigation portfolios, and identify strategies that deliver meaningful risk reduction within real-world constraints.
FEP combines technical analysis with utility operating and field context.
SERVICES
Support tailored to the decision at hand
01 Mitigation portfolio design and scenario comparison
02 Risk-spend efficiency and cost-benefit analysis
03 Capital and O&M sequencing under constraints
04 Financial consequence and liability exposure analysis
05 Implementation roadmaps and portfolio phasing
06 Investment justification, governance, and decision support
WHAT THIS ENABLES
Investment choices tied to measurable risk reduction
Clearer tradeoffs among risk, cost, reliability, timing, and feasibility
Defensible investment strategies aligned with system needs and risk tolerance
FEP PERSPECTIVE
Prioritize the investments that reduce the most meaningful risk.
Wildfire mitigation decisions require utilities to balance safety, reliability, affordability, feasibility, and pace. FEP evaluates how individual measures and combined portfolios change expected outcomes, translates remaining risk into financial terms, and tests how different portfolios perform across scenarios.
The result is a practical and transparent investment strategy tailored to each utility’s assets, operations, service territory, and risk tolerance—not a generic list of mitigations or an assumption that the most expensive or technology-intensive option is necessarily the best.
01 Baseline, mitigated, and residual risk expressed in financial terms
02 Portfolio scenarios, sequencing, and risk-spend efficiency
03 Direct, indirect, and total economic consequences
04 Affordability, reliability, operational, stakeholder, and regulatory considerations